Old system is an 8 core i7 6900k and new one is 16 core i9 9960x.Īny ideas as to what might cause this slowdown?Īre you demuxing straight from the Blu-Ray? If you are, are you using the same Blu-Ray drive? I have also tried to do the demux through MeGUI, but I think it also uses eac3to, and is just as slow. so there shouldn't be any changes in the installation.
I have simply copied the eac3to folder from the old system to the new one. I have not been able to find anything that makes the new system demux as fast as the new one though. I am using the same command line on both systems, and have tried to use both HDD and SSD on both systems. I have just installed a new PC, and am quite puzzled by how eac3to is reacting.įor some reason eac3to is now 2-3 times slower at demuxing than it is on my old system.ĭemuxing a bluray on old system takes for example 9 minutes.ĭemuxing the same bluray on the new system takes 20-30 minutes. This rounding I can understand but the previous one seems to me that rounding to 95905 is too much. In the latter case, the conversion factor is 92067,932, which must be rounded to 92068 to obtain the expected value.
I can understand that we are using a multiplo of 5, for reasons that I do not understand, since I have made a conversion table, and this is the only conversion along with PAL to FILM, which disagree with the operations made from another editor. If I use the amount 95905, I get: 24 min 39 sec 147 ms which is approximated to that obtained with eac3to being 146 ms. When truncating this amount, in audition change the sampling rate to 95904 and the result is an audio with the following duration: 24 min 39 sec 163 ms The conversion factor gives me a samplerate change of 95904.096. Hi, I am converting audio between NTSC and FILM and I noticed that the final result, in duration, is distinctive to the expected one.įor example, starting with an audio of the following characteristics: